Editorial Standards

Our Commitment

Knelstrom is committed to producing independent journalism that is accurate, transparent and accountable.

We believe readers are best served by reporting that is evidence-based, clearly sourced and presented with appropriate context. Whether covering public policy, current affairs, defence, technology or historical subjects, we aim to inform rather than persuade.

These Editorial Standards explain the principles that guide our reporting and publishing decisions.

Accuracy

Accuracy is the foundation of our journalism.

We take reasonable steps to verify factual information before publication using reliable and, wherever practical, primary sources.

These may include:

  • Government publications
  • Parliamentary documents
  • Legislation
  • Court judgments
  • Official statistics
  • Public records
  • Academic research
  • Interviews and direct statements

No publication can guarantee absolute perfection, but we strive to minimise errors through careful research and editorial review.

Independence

Knelstrom is published independently by Knelstrom Ltd.

Editorial decisions are made independently and are not influenced by political parties, governments, advertisers or commercial partners.

Any sponsored or promotional content will always be clearly identified.

Fairness

We aim to report fairly and accurately.

Where individuals or organisations are the subject of criticism or allegations, we will seek comment where it is appropriate and practical to do so.

We believe readers benefit from understanding differing viewpoints on matters of public interest.

News, Analysis and Opinion

Knelstrom publishes several types of content.

Newswire

Newswire contains factual reporting and evidence-based analysis of current events.

Dispatches

Dispatches contains opinion, commentary and editorial analysis. These articles reflect the views of the author and should not be interpreted as straight news reporting.

Chronicles

Chronicles contains long-form features, historical writing, books and documentary-style projects.

We aim to distinguish clearly between factual reporting and opinion.

Sources

Where practical, we prefer primary sources over secondary reporting.

Examples include:

  • Official government publications
  • Parliamentary proceedings
  • Public inquiries
  • Consultation documents
  • Regulatory decisions
  • Court records
  • Original research

When using secondary sources, we seek reputable, reliable publications.

Anonymous sources may be used only where there is a legitimate public interest and disclosure could place the source at risk.

Corrections

If we publish a significant factual error, we will correct it promptly and transparently.

Readers are encouraged to notify us of any inaccuracies.

Our approach is explained in our Corrections Policy.

Right of Reply

We recognise that individuals and organisations should have a fair opportunity to respond to significant criticism or factual allegations.

Requests for a right of reply are considered in accordance with our published Right of Reply policy.

Transparency

We aim to be transparent about:

  • authorship;
  • publication dates;
  • significant updates;
  • sources where appropriate;
  • corrections.

Opinion pieces are clearly identified.

Sponsored or commercial content will be disclosed.

Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence may be used as an editorial assistance tool for tasks such as research organisation, drafting assistance, editing or formatting.

A human editor reviews all published content before publication.

AI-generated material is never accepted without editorial oversight, fact-checking and verification.

Further information is available in our AI & Editorial Assistance Policy.

Photography and Visual Content

Photographs, graphics and video should accurately represent the events or subjects being reported.

Where illustrative, archival or digitally created imagery is used, this will be made clear where appropriate.

Images will not be manipulated in a way that materially misrepresents events.

Privacy

We recognise the importance of balancing the public interest with individual privacy.

Editorial decisions involving personal information are made in accordance with applicable law, ethical considerations, and the legitimate public interest.

Complaints

We welcome constructive feedback and take complaints seriously.

Complaints are considered fairly and independently in accordance with our Complaints Procedure.

Editorial Responsibility

Responsibility for editorial content rests with the Editor.

Editorial judgement includes decisions regarding:

  • newsworthiness;
  • verification;
  • sourcing;
  • legal considerations;
  • public interest;
  • Publication timing.

Our Principles

The following principles guide the work published by Knelstrom:

  • Accuracy before speed.
  • Evidence before assumption.
  • Independence before influence.
  • Transparency wherever possible.
  • Clear distinction between reporting and opinion.
  • Accountability through published corrections.
  • Respect for readers’ ability to reach their own informed conclusions.

These principles underpin every article, report and editorial decision published by Knelstrom.